martes, 19 de agosto de 2008

brutal honesty

He emails today with information regarding a co-op living arrangement. Costs would come to about $800-900/month, all inclusive. He would have his own room, but share the living space with other individuals and families. Children are permitted to stay. Location is a hip, Berkeley-esque area of this particular metropolitan area, although crime is notably high there as well.

Hence begin the myriad of feelings in which I am currently swimming. Bear with me; I know how I sound. I just need to get it all out.

1. The thought that had me almost to tears in the consideration of this possibility is the fact that this would be seriously detrimental to the time he would get to have with his children. Overnights during the week would be impossible as he would be incapable (unless he develops some fantastic form of time travel) of getting from there to this area for school drop-offs. I could not permit and would not want him to have the children every single weekend; not only do I deserve a weekend or two a month, he should also be allowed "down time". And the children need his presence.

2. I know that living in a co-op situation is a wonderful thing for many people. I cannot see how that would work necessarily for him, however. The last time he lived with many different people who had their own quarters and common areas was as the commanding officer on a ship; he had peons to do his dirty work for him and didn't have to contribute to the common good. In a co-op all responsibilities are shared and divided equally. He would, this way, have meals ready for him most of the time, so that would be a good thing for him. But he would also have to reciprocate, not only in the kitchen but also in the cleaning and upkeep, etc. Perhaps that would be good for him. Perhaps that would draw him out of living in his own little room. I would think that it would be very hard to go from a house on 1/3 acre to merely having a room, however, that isn't even an efficiency apartment.

2.5. Breaking it down, it is still beyond our means, and he believes we should wait to do this until the children are both in full-time school and I can pursue full-time pay and my own benefits. I think that, with sacrifices, it would be a step--maybe not a permanent step but a first step--and will define if and how this is to work.

3. I then start to think, erroneously, that all will be okay here and that we can just continue on as is. We can get along fine as long as we don't overdo it on the time spent in the same room. I find it much easier to be nice, even sit and talk or smile and be friendly now that I know we are on the same page. I want something better for him. I know I am hurting him. But in thinking this I forget about how much I have been hurt, how much I have been forgotten and merely pushed aside, and I know that we will never again have a life as a "couple" again; we will never return to intimacy. Is this fair to the children, in the end, to see two people, however civilly living together but not practicing any degree of intimacy? Is this healthy? This is not the image of marriage and cohabitation with another I want to give them. But I want them to have their father as equally as they have me, when they can.

So then I start to fall back into my old cycle of, "well, I can just put on the happy face and pretend that we are just one happy family and try to make that work for the good of the children--it's what he wants, too, and I'm the only one who loses out that way, so really everyone else will gain if I just sacrifice what I want, so why should I be so selfish?"

And then I remember how much trying to live the false life for so long knocked me into such a horrible funk that I don't want to revisit that dark place again. I need to be true to me. But why at such a price? Where is the line?

So that's where I am, folks. Ping-ponging worse than any politician could ever be accused of, trying to figure out what is best for everyone. I have always factored in, perhaps too strongly, the lives-feelings-issues-etc. of others in my decisions, unable to do anything just for me.

But I'm a mother. "Just for me" is no longer allowed.

9 comentarios:

  1. Whew. There is no easy answer. YOu are absolutely right that once you have kids, you can't make a decision based just on what you want or need. And yet, you also can't ignore what you want or need. I truly believe it is impossible to pretend everything is okay when it is not. And I don't believe it is good for children to have their parents tolerating each other just for the sake of both being in the same household "for the children." The sad fact is that many marriages just do not last. I think it's better to acknowledge it and let the kids see you handling the ending with some degree of grace and commitment to their well-being.

    ResponderEliminar
  2. Dang girl. My ex-sister-in-law did this for some time and the kids liked having both of them around. They were civil and each had their own space. I simply couldn't handle the negative energy when the ex still lived with me.

    It is difficult once you're in two different places because suddenly, you'll find you have them 99% of the time alone. Even tonight, I told the ex that I re-read our divorce decree and noticed that he's supposed to have the kids for a month during the summer. (Our divorce was just final in June) He actually seemed surprised. I almost felt like they were my kids and he was just doing me a favor by watching them every other weekend and once a week. Anyway, it is very weird to go from living together to not... only you can decide what you can or cannot handle. Good luck.

    ResponderEliminar
  3. My own arrangement with the ex is brand new, and so far, we've been able to share the space amicably -except that I have no space right now because my niece is doing child care for two weeks and she's sleeping in my room, so I'm feeling crowded. But I can't see this lasting forever- E will be in first grade next year, and I will have more flexibility to work.

    One thing we have agreed on, besides the need for us to each have space, is that we need to make arrangements that allow us to share equal time with her. She needs both her parents in her life, and I will need time for myself that's not confined to every other weekend. If he really considers himself a parenting partner, he will choose a living arrangement that meets her needs as well as his own.

    ResponderEliminar
  4. OH Geez,

    I so hear what you are saying. You are further along in the process than I am, but at the same time, it seems like he is grasping at straws to get out. I am not sure what the kids will think seeing their parents living "civilally" together. Not ideal for sure, but not horrible at least in the short term.

    I have no answers, do you want a glass of wine and we can talk it over?

    ResponderEliminar
  5. Thinking of you. There's no easy answer is there? I know you will work it out for the best for all concerned, but do remember that you need to be happy so that your children have a happy mother. Blessings.

    ResponderEliminar
  6. It's different for everyone isn't it? My mistake was waiting until there was nothing but disgust left and I couldn't stand it another minute.

    Kids are much more resiliant than we give them credit for.

    I think sometimes the hardest part is making the decision and then once it's made to stick with it. Course the sticking with it part might just be me. I'm flaky that way.

    And then there is also the change. I've recently realized that it isn't the end result of change that is so painful. It's the damned process. Generally the end result is a very good thing.

    ResponderEliminar
  7. I don't think that there is an easy answer to this or one that won't leave you with second thoughts time and time again. Kids are amazing, but I can understand the desire to have him continue to live with you as well, for the kids.

    Just remember that the best parent you can be is when you are the best person you can be. We give so much to our kids and for our kids that we often forget to take care of us. Sometimes the "mom" has to come first so that the kids get the best of her possible.

    Does tha tmake sense? Take care of you - your kids will benefit greatly from your strength and be okay with the decision you make.

    ResponderEliminar
  8. No, I agree with all of you in that nothing is easy. I'm working on it. But somehow it all comes back to the same mantra: If Mommy ain't happy, ain't nobody happy.

    Your input, wisdom, experiences and opinions are varied and valued. Thank you all. At the very least, I cannot honestly say I feel alone.

    Be well, all.

    ResponderEliminar